Avatar for Username

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊，或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

此討論串已被封存。 如果您有需要幫助，請新增一個新問題

How do I add "invalid" RSS links that work fine in other readers

  • 1 回覆
  • 1 有這個問題
  • 3 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 Matt

yeqkmhj
yeqkmhj
more options

I am on Tails version 4.0, and Thunderbird version 60.9.0 (64-bit)

3/4ths of the podcast links that I used to be able to view in the tor browser do not validate on https://validator.w3.org/feed/

I used to be able to view these feeds just fine in the tor browser, and it would be odd if 3/4ths of the podcasts that I listen to all screwed up their RSS configuration, so I assume this is a thunderbird or w3 validator issue.

An example would be Hello Internet: http://www.hellointernet.fm/ http://www.hellointernet.fm/podcast?format=rss https://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hellointernet.fm%2Fpodcast%3Fformat%3Drss

I am on Tails version 4.0, and Thunderbird version 60.9.0 (64-bit) 3/4ths of the podcast links that I used to be able to view in the tor browser do not validate on https://validator.w3.org/feed/ I used to be able to view these feeds just fine in the tor browser, and it would be odd if 3/4ths of the podcasts that I listen to all screwed up their RSS configuration, so I assume this is a thunderbird or w3 validator issue. An example would be Hello Internet: http://www.hellointernet.fm/ http://www.hellointernet.fm/podcast?format=rss https://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hellointernet.fm%2Fpodcast%3Fformat%3Drss

所有回覆 (1)

Matt
Matt
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

I do not have an answer for you, but clicking that link to the web site and clicking the RSS feeds link in the heading causes firefox to pop up something about what to do with a link to a Podcast, instead of open the feed page in Firefox. So I think the issue might be in the core Mozilla platform, not in Thunderbird as such. That is if the RSS feeds are in fact valid.

Opening the same link is chrome displayed the XML source and then Chrome asked if the link was a feed. If it was actually correct I would have expected better handing. However loading some of my feeds in Chrome saw the same ugly interface and raw data display. So I really do not know.