Avatar for Username

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信，及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

话题已存档。 如果需要帮助请提出新问题。

Are proxy whitelist rules ignored in add-ons

  • 2 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 5 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 barta2

barta2
barta2
more options

Are Firefox add-ons (uBlock etc.) ignoring proxy whitelisting when they automaticaly updates filter rules? Observed behavior (example) - using proxy in Firefox with whitelisted easylist.to (network.proxy.no_proxies_on), proxy control panel still shows comunication to easylist.to. Is this somehow on me, or is it a bug?

Are Firefox add-ons (uBlock etc.) ignoring proxy whitelisting when they automaticaly updates filter rules? Observed behavior (example) - using proxy in Firefox with whitelisted easylist.to (''network.proxy.no_proxies_on''), proxy control panel still shows comunication to easylist.to. Is this somehow on me, or is it a bug?

所有回复 (2)

barta2
barta2 提问者
more options

Dropa said
Addon issue are to contact their Addon Developer about problems relating to how their Addon works.

asked first, got following answer: "uBO just makes a network request to easylist.to, how it's routed beyond making the network request is beyond the control of uBO."

barta2
barta2 提问者
more options

Blocker itselfs afaik works well, i don´t know if its something they do wrong or if Firefox is to blame (or me ofc) - same behavior observed at publicsuffix.org (which is updated directly by browser? - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61745387/how-does-chrome-or-any-other-browser-use-public-suffix-list ) (proxy whitelist is in following format: .mozilla.net,.mozilla.org,.mozilla.com,.easylist.to,.publicsuffix.org)