搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

filtering email for junk settings

  • 7 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 12 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Matt

more options

I have for so long tried to let TB learn what is junk but nothing seems to work. I have also started taking the time to first mark as junk and then go into that junk folder and create a filter. My settings do not seem to make a difference. I have the filter set Mark before junk classification, match ANY of the following (so the @xxxx shows), and in the last section I have tried to set it to DELETE and also to MOVE message to junk folder on that email address. Nothing seems to work. I know there can be many junk senders from the same @xxx address but at some point I would think this "learning" process would take hold. Should I just give up on this timely filters and just mark as junk and then delete? Am i doing something wrong so my filters or junk settings are not filtering out new junk emails?

I have for so long tried to let TB learn what is junk but nothing seems to work. I have also started taking the time to first '''mark as junk '''and then go into that junk folder and '''create a filter'''. My settings do not seem to make a difference. I have the filter set '''Mark before junk classification,''' '''match ANY of the following''' (so the @xxxx shows), and in the last section I have tried to set it to '''DELETE and also to MOVE message to junk folder''' on that email address. Nothing seems to work. I know there can be many junk senders from the same @xxx address but at some point I would think this "learning" process would take hold. Should I just give up on this timely filters and just mark as junk and then delete? Am i doing something wrong so my filters or junk settings are not filtering out new junk emails?

所有回复 (7)

more options
I have for so long tried to let TB learn what is junk but nothing seems to work.

You'd need to be way more specific about what this means.

I have also started taking the time to first mark as junk and then go into that junk folder and create a filter.

What's the point of creating a filter after a message has been classified as Junk and been moved to the Junk folder?

Should I just give up on this timely filters and just mark as junk and then delete?

The attempt to fight spam using static filters is futile. Just use Thunderbird junk mail controls, and let Thunderbird automatically delete messages moved to the Junk folder, e.g. after 14 days. Also see https://support.mozilla.org/kb/thunderbird-and-junk-spam-messages

more options

Thank you for your reply..I agree the filters seem futile. I set my auto delete as you directed. I also have the box to mark as read for junk mail UNchecked but it still puts them into the junk folder as read. No really big inconvenience but wondered if there is another box I should check too.

由OldBob2于修改

more options
I also have the box to mark as read for junk mail UNchecked but it still puts them into the junk folder as read.

I'm seeing this too, but haven't found a way to fix it so far. I won't loose any sleep over it though.

more options

Thank you.

more options

oldbob2 said

Nothing seems to work. I know there can be many junk senders from the same @xxx address but at some point I would think this "learning" process would take hold.

I know you have basically solved your issue to your satisfaction, but the reality is the junk filtering does not look at the address sending mail to determine if the content is junk. Not knowing this is a frequent cause of folk thinking it is somehow broken. What I am saying is it will not take hold, because the system is not set to even consider it. There are very valid reasons for not looking at the address, mostly that spam is frequently send from legitimate addresses that are in no way related to the spammer or what they are selling.

more options

Thank you Matt, it would then seem helpful for TB not to have the option on the filter menu to select the FROM @xx if TB does not look at it.

more options

Thunderbird filters on the from in message filters... the junk filter is not a standard filter and it does not. The junk filter a Bayesian learning filter. Basic mail filters are not so do not learn.