Avatar for Username

Zoeken in Support

Vermijd ondersteuningsscams. We zullen u nooit vragen een telefoonnummer te bellen, er een sms naar te sturen of persoonlijke gegevens te delen. Meld verdachte activiteit met de optie ‘Misbruik melden’.

Meer info

Deze conversatie is gearchiveerd. Stel een nieuwe vraag als u hulp nodig hebt.

Is it possible that Firefox prevents serverside includes (SSI) from functioning?

  • 2 antwoorden
  • 1 heeft dit probleem
  • 10 weergaven
  • Laatste antwoord van jerryerp

jerryerp
jerryerp
more options

I am no doubt asking in the wrong place, but...I have Apache2 running on a linux locally. I believe I have set it up to support server-side includes. I have a cgi-bin perl script, hell.pl: 

#!/usr/bin/perl

print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
print "Hello, world\n";
exit;

Under Firefox, I can generate the Hello World page through the url

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/hell.pl

where xxx.xxx... is the apache2 server address.

But if I try to do that via the html file: 

<HTML>
<HEAD></HEAD>
Test:<BR>
<BODY>
<!--#include virtual=/cgi-bin/hell.pl" -->
</BODY></HTML>

All I get is page which is blank except for the "Test:" on line 1. The apache error and access logs show no relevant problems, as if the browser treats the serverside include as a comment.

I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration, but I have studied and studied... and am now clutching at straws.

I am no doubt asking in the wrong place, but...I have Apache2 running on a linux locally. I believe I have set it up to support server-side includes. I have a cgi-bin perl script, hell.pl: <br /> <pre><nowiki>#!/usr/bin/perl print "Content-type: text/html\n\n"; print "Hello, world\n"; exit; </nowiki></pre> Under Firefox, I can generate the Hello World page through the url xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/hell.pl where xxx.xxx... is the apache2 server address. But if I try to do that via the html file: <br /> <pre><nowiki><HTML> <HEAD></HEAD> Test:<BR> <BODY> <!--#include virtual=/cgi-bin/hell.pl" --> </BODY></HTML> </nowiki></pre> All I get is page which is blank except for the "Test:" on line 1. The apache error and access logs show no relevant problems, as if the browser treats the serverside include as a comment. I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration, but I have studied and studied... and am now clutching at straws.

Bewerkt door cor-el op

Gekozen oplossing

jerryerp wrote: 

Is it possible that Firefox prevents serverside includes (SSI) from functioning?

I don't see how. A browser can only botch client-side scripting like Javascript.

jerryerp wrote: 

I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration [...]

By default, SSI is only interpreted for special file extensions like .shtml. See the “Configuring your server to permit SSI” section of the Apache tutorial for details on how to change this.

Dit antwoord in context lezen 👍 1

Alle antwoorden (2)

Gingerbread Man
Gingerbread Man
more options

Gekozen oplossing

jerryerp wrote: 

Is it possible that Firefox prevents serverside includes (SSI) from functioning?

I don't see how. A browser can only botch client-side scripting like Javascript.

jerryerp wrote: 

I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration [...]

By default, SSI is only interpreted for special file extensions like .shtml. See the “Configuring your server to permit SSI” section of the Apache tutorial for details on how to change this.

jerryerp
jerryerp Vraageigenaar
more options

But not entirely. In the first instance, I tried the .shtml route suggested in the docs section by adding the Options, Addtype, and AddOutputFilters lines to the .htaccess file in /.htdocs and renamed hello.html to hello.shtml. At first, this simply created a page listing the hello.shtml file. Then I moved the configuration changes to the httpd configuration file and restarted apache. The result was the same as I reported earlier. Changing the hell.pl reference in hello.shtml and the file name in the cgi-bin directory to hell.shtml gave the same result.

Next I tried the XBitHack method to yield the result I reported earlier. It seems then that something hidden in my configuration file is the problem. Thanks anyway.